Issue6

Title Validation of migrated clientids
Priority required Status resolved-edit-complete
Superseder Nosy List dnoveck, spencer.shepler
Assigned To spencer.shepler Topics clientid, migration

Created on 2006-03-17.22:41:09 by spencer.shepler, last changed 2006-10-20.19:17:40 by spencer.shepler.

Messages
msg417 (view) Author: spencer.shepler Date: 2006-10-20.19:17:40
included in draft-08
msg400 (view) Author: dnoveck Date: 2006-10-19.12:41:51
I believe that the stuff that Mike and I have checked in resolves this and so it
should be marked complete as soon as draft-08 goes out.
msg164 (view) Author: dnoveck Date: 2006-06-25.14:46:43
I've assigned this back to you in the belief that this is already addressed by
the stuff in location_info.  If you don't agree and you think some change is
needed, explain what you think is missing and assign it back to me.

Otherwise, just close it.  I'm not sure whether edit-complete or no-change is
more appropriate.
msg91 (view) Author: dnoveck Date: 2006-06-13.14:21:10
I believed that this is addressed by the location_info proposal.

If you agree, plase close this.  Otherwise let's begin the wg
discussion with what is in the next draft as a base.
msg7 (view) Author: spencer.shepler Date: 2006-03-17.22:41:09
See the following for the issue:

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg02564.html

To summarize, for a set of cooperating servers that can share/transfer
NFSv4 state information, how would the client know or confirm
that the state has also been migration along with the filesystem
History
Date User Action Args
2006-10-20 19:17:41spencer.sheplersetstatus: editing -> resolved-edit-complete
messages: + msg417
2006-10-19 12:41:54dnovecksetstatus: wg-discuss -> editing
messages: + msg400
2006-06-25 14:46:44dnovecksetmessages: + msg164
2006-06-13 14:21:11dnovecksetnosy: + dnoveck
messages: + msg91
2006-03-17 22:41:09spencer.sheplercreate